Legal Opinion

Railway Labor Executives' Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission, and Daniel R. Murray, Intervening

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 12, 1990No. 89-3148, 89-3208PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

Two rail unions have filed a petition for review of a final order by the Interstate Commerce Commission approving the purchase of a rail line. Finance Docket No. 31522, Rio Grande Industries, Inc .—Pur chase and Trackage Rights —Chicago, Missouri & Western Ry. Co. Line Between St. Louis & Chicago, 5 I.C.C.2d 952 (1989). They believe that the order gives insufficient protection to the rights of workers on the line. A competing railroad has also filed a petition for review; its concern is with a potential diversion of revenue from its own lines. The respondents…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Armour & Co. (In Re Total Transportation, Inc.)District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
  2. Feldspar Trucking Co. v. Greater Atlanta Shippers Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1987
  3. Rebel Motor Freight, Inc. v. Southern Beverage Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1987

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Continental Can Company, Inc. v. Chicago Truck Drivers, Helpers and Warehouse Workers Union (Independent) Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  2. Koch Industries, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. McCarty Farms, Inc. v. Surface Transportation BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Ametek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  5. Orscheln Bros. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Zenith Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API