Legal Opinion

Marriage of Gummow v. Gummow

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 1, 1985No. C4-85-893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Rosanne Gummow appeals from an amended judgment and decree of dissolution and from a denial of her motion for new trial. She claims the property distribution was erroneous.

Respondent Gary Gummow filed a notice of review claiming the court selected the wrong date when it valued appellant’s pension.

We affirm.

FACTS

This case has been before us previously. Gummow v. Gummow, 356 N.W.2d 426 (Minn.Ct.App.1984). In Gummow I, both parties appealed the trial court’s decision. We remanded for an equitable property distribution. Rosanne Perlick (Perlick) appeals from the second…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Hertz v. HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. Marriage of Schmitz v. SchmitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freking v. FrekingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Marriage of Carlson v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Fette v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Marriage of March v. MarchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Redding v. OldewartelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API