Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Reid v. Kemp

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 1978No. 38690PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLEMENS, Judge.

Appeal by intervenors Lindell and Annette Kemp from the trial court’s judgment confiscating their automobile to the state because it had been used illegally by inter-venors’ son to transport a controlled substance. Intervenors do not dispute the state’s evidence: Their son, defendant Michael Kemp, was arrested for driving while intoxicated; as he exited his parents’ car he tried but failed to destroy a packet of marijuana.

The state brought this proceeding under § 195.145, VAMR, authorizing confiscation of such an automobile. The issue here arises from intervenors’ pleaded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Hetzler v. MillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. United States v. 1—1941 Ford 2 Ton Truck, Motor No. BB18-6,674,033District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  4. Wile v. DonovanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Executive Jet Management & Pilot Service, Inc. v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Gibson v. Reliable Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Dilts v. LynchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. State v. EberenzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. State v. HamptonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API