State v. Hampton
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
This case comes to this writer on reassignment.
The state appeals the trial court’s granting of respondent Ferman Hampton’s Motion to Dismiss a Petition for Forfeiture under the Criminal Activity Forfeiture Act (CAFA), as contained in §§ 513.600 to 513.-645, RSMo 1986. The sole issue is whether the time limitations for state action after a seizure of property which has been used or intended for use or derived from criminal activity are mandatory. Section 513.607.-5(2) states as follows with emphasis added:(2) Seizure may be effected by a law enforcement officer authorized to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. RosenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. One 1988 Ford Coupe Vin 1FABP41A9JF143651Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SleddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- Yahne v. Pettis County Sheriff DepartmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Karpierz v. EasleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Vincent v. D.C., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.