Legal Opinion
State v. Eberenz
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 19, 1991No. 58668PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
The state appeals after dismissal of a statutory civil action for forfeiture of real and personal property allowed under the Criminal Activity Forfeiture Act [CAFA], Section 513.600 et. seq. RSMo 1986. The trial court granted defendant’s motion on the ground the petition for forfeiture was not filed within the time restraints set forth in § 513.607.5(2). The provisions of § 513.607.5(2) require a seizing authority to notify a prosecuting authority within three days of seizure “and the prosecuting attorney or attorney general shall, within five days after receiving notice of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO. INC. v. MahnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Hedges v. Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Reid v. KempMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. SleddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- State ex rel. MacLaughlin v. TreonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sharon Putman, Joann Lee v. Unknown Smith, St. Louis County Police Officer Dsn 2116 St. Louis CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State v. BeairdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.