Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
The sole issue presented by this appeal questions whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. We hold that the trial court did commit error.
Before discussing the merits of this case, one procedural point deserves mention. Where the question of granting a di rected verdict is a close one, the better practice is for the trial judge to reserve his decision on the motion and allow the case to be submitted to the jury. If the jury returns a verdict in favor of the moving party, no decision on the motion is necessary and an appeal may be avoided. If the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Aaser v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by128 opinions
- Turner v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Pearce v. American Defender Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Foster v. Winston-Salem Joint VentureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
123 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.