Legal Opinion

Hall v. Mabe

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1985No. 8521DC319PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Defendants bring forward a number of arguments, most of which are based on their motion for directed verdict. A motion for directed verdict must state the grounds therefor; otherwise, error may not be urged on appeal. G.S. 1A-1, R. Civ. P. 50; Lee v. Keck, 68 N.C. App. 320, 315 S.E. 2d 323, disc. rev. denied, 311 N.C. 401, 319 S.E. 2d 271 (1984). No grounds for the motion appear of record though it appears that the ground asserted was insufficiency of the evidence. We will consider denial of the motion on that basis. See Anderson v. Butler, 284 N.C. 723, 202 S.E. 2d 585 (1974).…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Collins v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Ellis Jones, Inc. v. Western Waterproofing Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  4. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Catoe v. Helms Construction & Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. State v. ConnardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Triad Packaging, Inc. v. SupplyOne, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2013
  4. Dixon v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Inman v. InmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API