Legal Opinion

Willoughby v. KENNETH W. WILKINS, MD, PA

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 828SC1190PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

Plaintiff assigns as error the granting of defendant Cain’s motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiffs evidence. Plaintiff contends that a directed verdict was improper because the evidence was sufficient to raise a jury issue as to whether a physician-patient relationship existed between defendant Cain and plaintiff. We agree.

A motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure raises the question as to whether there is sufficient evidence to go to the jury. In considering a motion for a directed verdict, the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Willis v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Shelak v. White Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  4. Marion Davis v. Marathon Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
  5. Hendricks v. Leslie Fay, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Bumgarner v. ReneauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Coffman v. RobersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Hylton v. KoontzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Peace River Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Ward Transformer Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Paris v. MICHAEL KREITZ JR., PACourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API