Legal Opinion

Ahern v. Tulare Lake Canal Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 18, 1931No. Docket No. 157PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The present áction was instituted by respondents to enforce delivery of a certain stock certificate No. 187 representing 948 shares of the preferred stock of the Tulare Lake Canal Company, a corporation, or in case delivery of said stock certificate should not be had, to recover the value of the shares of stock in said corporation represented by said stock certificate. Respondents’ claim to the ownership of the stock is based upon a judgment recovered by them on March 3, 1928, in an action instituted by said respondents against the copartnership of Turner & Von Glahn. This prior action was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northwestern Portland Cement Co. v. Atlantic Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Powers v. Pacific Diesel Engine Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Spreckels v. Nevada BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Nat. Bank Etc. v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Hall v. CayotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burns v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Boye v. BoernerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Graham v. Young Et UxSuperior Court of Delaware · 1933
  4. Barberi v. RothchildCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Salomon v. EllisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API