Legal Opinion

Barberi v. Rothchild

California Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1936No. S. F. 15573PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff sued to enjoin a sale of real property under a deed of trust and to quiet title to the property. In a trial upon an agreed statement of facts the defendants had judgment.

The pertinent facts are: Plaintiff, while owner of the fee, made two deeds of trust on August 9, 1920; one was recorded at 3:06 P. M. and the other at 3 :07 P. M. of the day of execution. On October 1, 1924, the property was sold under the deed first recorded to a brother of the plaintiff. On July 12, 1926, plaintiff filed a petition in bankruptcy and obtained his discharge on October 20th of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Clark v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Plum v. Studebaker Bros.' ManufacturingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. Merchants National Bank of Fargo v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Snyder v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank v. Bank of LenoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. San Francisco Design Center Associates v. Portman CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Howell v. DowlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Perego v. SeltzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. Transamerica Financial Services, Inc. v. LaffertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API