Legal Opinion

Graham v. Young Et Ux

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided June 28, 1933No. 516PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Attachment Fi. Fa.,

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

This case calls for a consideration of Section 36 of the Corporation Law (Section 1950 of the Revised Code of 1915).

It is apparent that the Statute covers two somewhat distinguishable matters and the history of the adoption of the section makes this more clear. The section covers:

1. Loans which are forbidden to be made by the corporation ;(a) Loans to any officer of the corporation;(b) Loans make to any stockholder upon the security of the stock of the corporation.

2. The denial of the right to take as security for a debt a lien upon any part of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Bank v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. Bond v. Terrell Cotton & Woolen Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. National Bank of Xenia v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Maclary v. Pleasant Hills, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1954
  2. State v. BrownNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Buckson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Holt v. Queen City Loan & Investment, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  5. MacLary v. Pleasant HillsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API