Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Bump

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1917No. Docket No. 115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Emmet; Shepherd, J. Assumpsit by Frances M. Loveland against Matie C. Bump and George W. McCabe, copartners as Bump & McCabe, on promissory notes. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Theodore O. Loveland and J. L. Records are copartners located at Iowa City, Iowa, and do business under the name of Brenard Manufacturing Company. Plaintiff, Frances M. Loveland, is the wife of Theodore O. Defendants comprise the firm of Bump & McCabe, and are located at Petoskey, in this State, where they conduct a retail hardware store. September 16,1914, defendants signed a contract or order of similar purport to the contracts found in the records of the cases of Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Seckinger, ante, 312 (164 N. W. 263), and Harrison v. Grier, post, 672 (165 N. W. 854), handed down…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harrison v. GrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. SeckingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Stevens v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Stevens v. VenemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Fort Wayne Mortgage Co. v. CarletosMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Pratt v. DuncanMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API