Harrison v. Grier
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne ; Murphy, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Charles W. Harrison against John A. Grier on a promissory note. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
The Lyon-Taylor Company was a co-partnership located at Iowa City, Iowa. Its traveling salesman called on defendant, a druggist, and a contract or order was signed, similar in its essentials to *673the contract involved in the case of Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Seckinger, ante, 312 (164 N. W. 263). Attached to the contract so that it could be detached was a note for the purchase price.
Charles W. Harrison, the plaintiff, claims to be an accountant. He lives at Iowa City, Iowa. He claims to have loaned to the Lyon-Taylor Company $1,000 upon a note not produced in evidence, and to have taken…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- John Schweyer & Co. v. MellonMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Boston Piano & Music Co. v. SeckingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stephenson v. GoldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Stevens v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Loveland v. BumpMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Stevens v. VenemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.