Legal Opinion

Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Seckinger

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1917No. Docket No. 102PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Assumpsit by the Boston Piano & Music Company against Joseph E. Seckinger for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

The defendant is engaged in the retail grocery business at the village of Manchester, Washtenaw county. On July 14, 1915, the agent of plaintiff called upon him, and the result of such call was a written order, or agreement, signed by defendant for the purchase of a piano, 12 minor articles, and the paraphernalia, literature, circulars, instruc*313tions, etc., necessary to put into operation and conduct a so-called advertising campaign, with the ultimate object of giving the piano and other articles away. The agreed purchase price was $465. It appears from the record that the piano and other 12…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rast v. Van Deman & Lewis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. People v. ElliottMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. La France v. CullenMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  3. Loveland v. BumpMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Harrison v. GrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. Jessup & Barrett Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API