Legal Opinion

Fort Wayne Mortgage Co. v. Carletos

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 1980No. Docket No. 78-5294PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. M. Ransom, J.

Defendant Carlos Carletos (hereinafter defendant) appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, which dismissed defendant’s counterclaim alleging malicious prosecution.

The record indicates money was loaned by plaintiff for several construction projects being undertaken by various construction companies controlled by defendant. The loans were insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). In order to have the money distributed as needed, Carletos would obtain a "construction draw” by submitting a "draw request form”, FHA form 2403.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Todd v. BiglowMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Bob v. HolmesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Wilson v. YonoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. People v. OrsieMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Macomb v. WilkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moody v. Chevron Chemical Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Cardenas v. MaslonDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2015
  3. Turner v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Turner v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API