Pratt v. Duncan
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Berrien; Bridgman, J. Assumpsit by W. I. Pratt against John F. Duncan on certain promissory notes. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Plaintiff claims to be the bona fide *633holder of certain promissory notes executed by defendant. These notes were detachable and were detached from a contract for the putting on of a gift enterprise devised in Iowa City, Iowa, of similar purport to the ones before this court in Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Seckinger, 198 Mich. 312; Harrison v. Grier, 198 Mich. 672; Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Clothing Co., 199 Mich. 141; and Stevens v. Venema, 202 Mich. 232, and with the same company involved in Loveland v. Bump, 198 Mich. 564. A reference to these cases will disclose the detail.
The instant case…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boston Piano & Music Co. v. Pontiac Clothing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Loveland v. BumpMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Stevens v. VenemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Harrison v. GrierMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Boston Piano & Music Co. v. SeckingerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by1 opinion
- Stevens v. ColeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929