Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Brown Shoe Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 25, 1935No. 3002PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, Circuit Judge.
This appeal involves a question of practice. The Brown Shoe Company brought an action at law against Daniels to recover certain payments which it had made to him under two patent license agreements, upon the ground that the consideration for such payments had failed. We shall refer to the parties, plaintiff and defendant, as they appeared in this original action. The defendant (Daniels) pleaded the general issue and certain other *900defenses, and also filed what is called a “bill of equitable counterclaim.” In this bill he set out the license agreements, charged breaches by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Marsch v. Southern New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Epstein v. . GluckinNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gulbenkian v. GulbenkianCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Steiner Sales Co. v. Schwartz Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
- Deering, Milliken & Co. v. Temp-Resisto CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoacheDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1969
- Century Investment Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.