Legal Opinion

Humble Oil & Refining Company v. DeLoache

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided February 20, 1969No. Civ. A. 67-722PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, OPINION AND ORDER

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.

This action for specific performance of two written options for lease of certain properties adjacent to the intersection of State Highway 261 and Interstate Highway 95, under construction, and located in Clarendon County, South Carolina, some five (5) miles from the Town of Manning, was tried before me without a jury at a term of Court held in Columbia, South Carolina, on November 18 and 19, 1968.

One of the sites covered by an option to lease was a filling station site, 200 x 200 feet, beginning at the…

2Cases cited77 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Massie v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  3. Indiana Ex Rel. Anderson v. BrandSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  5. Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of FrederickWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Reid v. ReidCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  3. Elliott v. DewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Alala v. Peachtree Plantations, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  5. State Ex Rel. Goff v. DIST. CT. OF 1ST JUD. DIST.Montana Supreme Court · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API