Joyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This is a workers’ compensation case in which the claimant’s total disability benefits were modified to partial disability benefits upon petition by the employer. The issue *246on appeal is whether the findings of fact on which the modification was based are supported by substantial evidence. In our previous Opinion, 545 Pa. 135, 680 A.2d 855 (1996), we determined that certain evidence submitted by the employer was hearsay and should not have been admitted. We concluded that the finding of job availability was based on this hearsay, and held that there was no substantial…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Acme Markets, Inc. v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ANNETTE PILVALIS)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Joyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Pertile v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cruz v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Roth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Berkshire Construction Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- C. Romano v. WCAB (Pocono Services for Families and Children)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
- Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.