Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. Saranchak

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 2001No. Application 310 Capital Appeal DktPublished

1Dissent

Justice CASTILLE dissenting.

In response to an application for reargument filed by the Federal Court Division of the Defender Association of Philadelphia (“Federal Defender”), Saranchak’s former counsel, the Court orders the PCRA court to conduct yet another colloquy with Saranchak to determine the veracity of his unsworn declaration attached to the application, as well as Saranchak’s “present intentions” with respect to the pursuit of post-conviction relief and reinstatement of the Federal Defender as his counsel. The Court’s order necessarily assumes that the allegation that Saranchak…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lonchar v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. MacHipongo Land & Coal Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Commonwealth v. SaranchakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API