Joyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
Allocatur was granted to address the basic issue of whether Commonwealth Court erred in determining that substantial evidence existed that a job was available to Appellant, William Joyce, and that he failed to make a good faith effort to obtain that job. Because the referee’s findings of fact relative to job availability are based upon objected-to hearsay evidence of a vocational counselor, we reverse.
On May 5, 1986, Appellant sustained an injury to his lower back in the course and scope of his employment with Appellee, Ogden/Allied Maintenance (hereinafter Employer),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Vann v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. CejaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Furnari v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rox Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Landmark Constructors, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Costello)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Magulick v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Bethlehem Steel Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- J.A. Jones Construction Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.