Legal Opinion

Acme Markets, Inc. v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (ANNETTE PILVALIS)

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1991No. 1803 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal by Acme Markets Inc. (Employer) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board *403(Board) which affirmed the decision of a referee1 denying the petition of Employer to modify/terminate benefits to Annette Pilvalis (Claimant).

The referee found that Claimant had been employed by Employer as a checker when, on January 15, 1981, she suffered a fracture to her ankle. She received compensation for total disability for this injury. Thereafter she attempted to return to work on several occasions, but always without success. The referee specifically found that as…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Farquhar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Volkswagen of America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Green v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. McCray v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Joyce v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API