Legal Opinion
In Re Arbitration Between Hennen & St. Paul Mercury Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 4, 1977No. 46757PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Scott, Justice.
This is an appeal in an insurance arbitration case. Separate arbitration tribunals were formed to settle the claims of Wallace R. Hennen and Albert Breeggemann against St. Paul Mercury-Insurance Company (Mercury). Mercury disputed the decision of the Breeggemann tribunal and moved in district court for an order vacating its decision. Breeggemann moved to confirm the arbitrators’ decision. Following consolidation, the district court denied the motion to vacate, confirmed the tribunal’s decision, and ordered judgment for Breeggemann. Mercury appeals from that judgment. We affirm.
O…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Dunshee v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. FruchtmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Libdy v. Companion Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Maher v. All Nation Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.