Doerner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
This declaratory judgment action raises the question of whether occupants of an insured motor vehicle involved in an accident, who have uninsured motorist coverage solely because of their status as passengers, may stack the uninsured coverage under a separate policy of insurance purchased by the owner of the involved vehicle for a noninvolved vehicle when they do not qualify as insureds under the second policy. The trial court answered the question in the negative and granted the motion of defendant State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) for summary judgment. We affirm.
Plainti…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Integrity Mutual Insurance v. State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Wasche v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Nygaard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Pleitgen Ex Rel. Pleitgen v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Murphy v. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Babcock v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Rusthoven v. Commercial Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Guarantee Insurance v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.