Legal Opinion

J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 18, 1954No. C. D. 1658PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The suit listed above was filed by the plaintiffs herein seeking to recover a certain sum of money alleged to have been illegally exacted as customs duties upon an importation of nylon fishing lines. The collector classified the merchandise as “Mfrs. of silk by similitude crins artificial imitation of cat gut ‘Nylon,’ ” and levied duty thereon at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1211 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802.

Plaintiffs claim said merchandise to be properly dutiable at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Murphy v. ArnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  5. Arthur v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Empire Brushes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  2. Cresca Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Steinberg Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Universal Foreign Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. A. L. Erlanger Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API