Legal Opinion

Railroad Commission v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 27, 1922No. 206PublishedCited by 155 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. The proceeding out of which this case has grown, known as the Wisconsin Passenger Fares, began in an investigation by the Interstate Commerce Commission, under paragraphs 3 and 4 of § 13 of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended by § 416. of the Transportation Act of 1920 (41 Stat. 484), into alleged undue and unreasonable discrimination against interstate commerce arising out of…

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. The proceeding out of which this case has grown, known as the Wisconsin Passenger Fares, began in an investigation by the Interstate Commerce Commission, under paragraphs 3 and 4 of § 13 of the Interstate Commerce Act as amended by § 416. of the Transportation Act of 1920 (41 Stat. 484), into alleged undue and unreasonable discrimination against interstate commerce arising out of intrastate railroad rates in Wisconsin. The interstate carriers by steam railroad of the State were made respondents, and the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Taft

The Commission’s order, interference with which was enjoined by the District Court, effects the removal of the unjust discrimination found to exist against persons in interstate commerce, and against interstate commerce, by fixing a minimum for intrastate passenger fares in Wisconsin at 3.6 cents per mile per passenger. This is done under paragraph 4 of § 13 of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended by the Transportation Act of 1920, which authorizes the Interstate Commerce Commission, after a prescribed investigation, to remove

“ Any undue or unreasonable advantage, preference, or prejudice…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Houston, East & West Texas Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Stafford v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. New England Divisions CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Colorado v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Florida v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API