Legal Opinion

Cresca Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 26, 1957No. C. D. 1864PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Plaintiff seeks to recover customs duties alleged to be excessive because certain soup mixes, imported by plaintiff, were classified as nonenumerated manufactured articles and charged with duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is plaintiff’s contention that these soup mixes should have been classified under paragraph 775, either directly or by virtue of the similitude provision of paragraph 1559.

Protest 249794-K alternatively claims that duty should be at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558, as modified, presum*213ab…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  2. Lang v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Goldfarb v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. Allied Food Corp. of Am. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Ansor Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  4. Cresca Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Cresca Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API