Legal Opinion

Empire Brushes, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 4, 1959No. C. D. 2078PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

This suit covers importations of bundles of Perlón filaments, approximately 24 inches in length, which are used in the manufacture of brushes. The collector of customs classified the imported merchandise as “Filaments of synth. textiles n/o 30" in length” under the provisions of paragraph 1302 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, and assessed duty thereon at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiffs claim the merchandise to be properly dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ringk v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Steinberg Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Almar Bristle & Hair Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  2. Almar Bristles & Hair Processing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Cone v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  4. Delmey Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  5. Department Brush Works Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API