Legal Opinion

Roy v. Kirn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Docket No. 76PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Error to Wayne; Webster (Clyde I.), J. Case by James M. Roy against Alfred Kirn and another for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant Kirn brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This case was originally begun against Alfred Kirn and Henrietta M. Glazier, there being two counts in the declaration. The first count alleged negligence of the defendant Kim, and the second count alleged negligence of defendant Glazier. Upon the trial, and at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence, the court directed a verdict and judgment for the last named defendant, and the trial proceeded against defendant Kim, resulting in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $2,000 damages and costs.

The first count of the declaration alleges that on March 3, 1916, defendant owned and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Massaletti v. FitzroyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Canfield v. City of JacksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Beard v. KlusmeierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Pigeon v. LaneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Naudzius v. LahrMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Boscaglia v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Stewart v. HoukOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Perozzi v. GaniereOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Young v. DyerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API