Sears v. Seattle Consolidated Street Railway Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
The appellant owns and operates lines of street railways in the city of Seattle, one of which has its terminus at Fremont, a suburban village some distance from the main portion of the city, and situated at the north end of Lake Union. It is known as the Fremont line, and connects with another line of street railway which extends to Green Lake, in the northern portion of the city. On September 16, 1891, the respondent Annie Sears entered *229upon one of the cars of the appellant to go to Green Lake. The motive power used upon the said railway is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Stokes v. SaltonstallSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Furnish v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1890
- G., C. & S. F. R'y Co. v. DorseyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. Perez-CervantesWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- State v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.