Wheeler v. Crane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
TJpon the petition of Albert M. Wheeler, the district court for Hennepin county granted its order directing J ay W. Crane to show cause why an order should not be made requiring him to execute and deliver to petitioner a substitution of attorneys in a certain action then pending and deliver certain documents belonging to petitioner. The answer to the petition set up an attorney’s lien upon the documents for his compensation.
Read the full summary
TJpon the petition of Albert M. Wheeler, the district court for Hennepin county granted its order directing J ay W. Crane to show cause why an order should not be made requiring him to execute and deliver to petitioner a substitution of attorneys in a certain action then pending and deliver certain documents belonging to petitioner. The answer to the petition set up an attorney’s lien upon the documents for his compensation. The matter was heard by Leary, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of Crane for $401 and that upon the payment of the judgment Crane consent in writing to…
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Eespondent moves to dismiss this appeal on the ground that it was not perfected within the time limited by statute.
The judgment was rendered and entered on October 23, 1917. The notice of appeal and bond were served and filed in March, 1918, but the appeal fee was not deposited with the clerk of the lower court until April 24, 1918, one day after the expiration of the time within which an appeal could be taken.
Section '2 of chapter 66 (p. 80), of the Laws of 1917, after providing for the service of a notice of appeal, further provides: “To render the appeal effective for any purpose…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Dempsey v. MeighenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Northern Oil & Gas Co. v. BirkelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Baxter v. Orinoco Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924