Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Wirtz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, C. J.

On March 12, 1937, defendants-respondents, Prank H. Wirtz and Metta E. Wirtz, entered into a contract with Edward Sidney Gould for the sale and purchase of the property in suit known as the Wildwood Auto Camp, and the personal property in use there. The purchase price was $4,200, of which $800 was paid upon the execution of the contract. The contract provided for the payment of the balance of the purchase price and interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum in monthly installments of $25 each. On or about January 13, 1939, Edward Sidney Gould assigned and transferred said contract…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Chicago Boulevard Land Co. v. Apartment GaragesMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Bishop v. BarndtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Maday v. RothMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Atkochunas v. GustafsonOregon Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dorsey Et Ux. v. Tisby Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Zumstein v. STOCKTON ET UX.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Elsasser v. WilcoxOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Roth Development, Inc. v. A. R. John General Contractors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Elsasser v. WilcoxOregon Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API