Legal Opinion

Zumstein v. STOCKTON ET UX.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1953PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrand, J.

The plaintiff Zumstein brought suit as the successor in interest to the vendor in a contract for the sale of real and personal property. The defendants Stockton are the vendees. The trial court held that the defendants were not in default at the time of the filing of the complaint; that the plaintiff, by his complaint had rescinded the contract; and that the defendants had elected to agree to the rescission. The court therefore entered a decree adjusting the mutual rights of the parties on the theory of a mutual rescission. The plaintiff appeals.

The construction and legal effect of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Elliott v. MosgroveOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Grider v. TurnbowOregon Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Epplett v. Empire Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Stinemeyer v. Wesco Farms, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
  2. County of Lincoln v. FISCHEROregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Renard v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Braunstein v. TrottierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. MacOmber v. WaxbomOregon Supreme Court · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API