Legal Opinion

In re Miller

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 11, 1947No. 5263PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the action of the Primary Examiner in rejecting as unpatentable over the prior art claims 22, 23, and 24 in appellant’s application for a patent for an alleged improvement in the method of making laps. Claim 15, drawn to method, was allowed by the examiner.

The references are—

Miller, Re. 134, April 24,1849.

Henry, 16,117, November 25,1856.

*911Yan Winkle, 299,297, May 27, 1884.

Archer, 371,918, October 25,1887.

Kitson, 374,899, December 13, 1887.

Crooker, 418,111, December 24, 1889.

Williams et al.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re StoverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Jeffrey B. Gorman and Marilyn KatzCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Application of DemarcheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  3. Application of HallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
  4. In re WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
  5. In re DeJarlaisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API