Legal Opinion
Blythe v. Pratt
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 5, 1935No. 23107PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
The plaintiff in error, J. E. Blythe, filed a petition in the district court to quiet title to six lots in Oak Terrace addition to the city of Tulsa. The Securities Adjustment Company, H. L. Cannady Company, H. D. Pratt, commissioner of finance and revenue of the city of Tulsa, and the city of Tulsa were named as defendants.
The Securities Adjustment Company and H. L. Cannady Company filed disclaimers. The defendant H. D. Pratt filed his answer alleging that he claimed some right, title, or interest in the property by virtue of ordinance No. 2760 passed by the city of Tulsa on December 12,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Moore v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
- Nelson v. PittsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- McGrath v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Prince v. Ypsilanti Savings BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nix v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Bradford v. SchmuckerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
- Baccus v. BanksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Board of County Com'rs v. City of Wewoka Ex Rel. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942