Legal Opinion
Nix v. Reynolds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1943No. 30600PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArnold, J.
This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county in June, 1941, by Jeff Nix against Fern Reynolds and W. L. Reynolds to obtain a judgment for the unpaid principal of a “tax bill,” together with interest, reasonable attorney’s fees, and costs.
The so-called “tax bill” was issued and the assessment to pay same was levied under and by virtue of the city charter and .ordinance of the city of Tulsa, and the plaintiff prayed that his judgment be declared a first and prior lien on the property involved and for foreclosure thereof. No personal judgment was sought.
The undisputed facts are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Sanford v. DialSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Berry v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Iowa Securities Co. v. BarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Warner, Trustee v. DaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Hutchman v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- Stephenson v. BonneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Reed v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Strickland v. PattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.