Baccus v. Banks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentGibson, J.
I think the importance of the question involved justifies this expression of the reasons why I cannot concur in the majority opinion.
I consider the effect of the opinion is to declare operative as a statute of limitation that which under the law cannot be imposed by the Legislature or recognized by the courts as such; that same is violative of the obligations of contract which is inhibited by the Federal Constitution; that same is in contravention of the powers of the courts arising under grant by the Oklahoma Constitution; and that its overall effect is to place the approval of this court…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Terry v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.