Legal Opinion

Gilliam v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1995No. 94-68PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Charis Gilliam appeals from her conviction for conspiracy to deliver marijuana.

We affirm.

Issues

Appellant presents three issues:

ISSUE I

Was it error to admit the hearsay statements, of an alleged co-conspirator without a prima facie showing that a conspiracy existed, of appellant’s membership in the conspiracy, or that such statements were made in furtherance of the conspiracy?

ISSUE II

Was the evidence produced at trial insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt all elements of the crime of conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance?

ISSUE III

Was it ... error to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  4. United States v. John FoxCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Apodaca v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Urrutia v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Candelaria v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Yetter v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API