Apodaca v. State

RAPER, Justice.

From his conviction of and sentence for delivery of a controlled substance in violation of § 35-7-1014(d)(x), W.S.1977, 1 and § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), W.S.1977, 2 along with conspiracy to deliver a controlled substance in violation of § 35-7-1042, W.S. 1977, 3 appellant has appealed on two bases. First, he claims that the admission of evidence regarding his sale of a substance which had been promoted by him as angel dust, 4 also known as PCP, unfairly prejudiced the jury against him and denied him a fair trial. Second, he argues that the failure of the information to allege an overt…