Urrutia v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Chad Urrutia appeals from his convictions for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and for conspiracy to deliver controlled substances.
We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant presents three issues for our review:
ARGUMENT I:
I) There was insufficient evidence to convict Appellant, Chad Urrutia, of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver under Wyoming Statute § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), given the fact that the State never proved what the substance was, whether or not Urrutia possessed the substance or that delivery was his intended action[.]
ARGUMENT II:
I)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Dwayne DolanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
- Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Seeley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.