Legal Opinion

Urrutia v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1996No. 95-201PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Chad Urrutia appeals from his convictions for possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance and for conspiracy to deliver controlled substances.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant presents three issues for our review:

ARGUMENT I:

I) There was insufficient evidence to convict Appellant, Chad Urrutia, of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver under Wyoming Statute § 35-7-1031(a)(ii), given the fact that the State never proved what the substance was, whether or not Urrutia possessed the substance or that delivery was his intended action[.]

ARGUMENT II:

I)…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. United States v. Dwayne DolanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. Kwallek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Wehr v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hodges v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Dysthe v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. FulminanteArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Seeley v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API