Legal Opinion

Jones v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1995No. 93-259PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Nathan Jones appeals from his convictions for one count of aiding and abetting aggravated robbery and one count of conspiracy to commit aggravated robbery.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant’s counsel presents six issues:

I. Whether Jason Strieker possessed actual authority under United States v. Matlock to permit a consensual entry or search when Jason Strieker was an overnight guest in appellant’s home and did not possess the common authority over the premises necessary to validly consent to a' search.

II. Whether Jason Strieker possessed apparent authority under Illinois v.…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Brown v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API