Legal Opinion
Low v. Golden Eagle Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 2002No. A097404PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
While working for appellant insured, U.S. Continental Marketing, Inc., an employee (Employee) filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against his employer, alleging his supervisor (Supervisor) had sexually harassed him; Supervisor was joined as a party defendant. On learning of Employee’s suit, KMEX, a Los Angeles radio station, decided to cover the story behind it. The focus of the KMEX coverage was Employee’s allegation he was forced to have sex with Supervisor in order to keep his job. David Williams, the president of appellant insured, also appeared on the broadcast…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. Barbara B.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Carpenter v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Frank and Freedus v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Peterborough Oil Co. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- American Alliance Insurance v. 1212 Restaurant Group, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- Garamendi v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.