Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Garamendi v. Golden Eagle Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 2005No. A105638, A106198PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

These consolidated appeals seek review of a trial court decision affirming the rejection by the Insurance Commissioner (commissioner) of certain claims against defendant Golden Eagle Insurance Company (Golden Eagle), an insurance company in conservatorship. Appellants, two former employees of Golden Eagle, filed claims in the conservatorship proceedings to recover for alleged fraudulent inducement of their employment contracts, wrongful discharge, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. After investigation, the commissioner rejected the claims as…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. The Conco Cos.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Melkonians v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Jones v. Golden Eagle InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Guarino v. Cnty. of Siskiyou, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Hughes v. PairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API