Legal Opinion

Richwind Joint Venture 4 v. Brunson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 22, 1994No. 120, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Before this Court are a number of related cases involving the tragic circumstances of children suffering from various injuries due to their consumption of lead-based paint. The petition for certiorari was granted in the instant case in order to address the following issues:

I. To what extent, if any, do the lead-based paint provisions of Baltimore City ordinances and Public Local Laws supersede the common law requirement that a landlord’s liability for negligence depends upon notice of a particular defect and a reasonable opportunity to correct it?

2. To what extent, if any,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Rosenblatt v. Exxon Co., U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Lutz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Scarlett Harbor Associates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Brooks v. Lewin Realty III, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Gore v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Bartholomee v. CaseyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API