Legal Opinion

Lutz v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 26, 1934No. [Nos. 7, 8, April Term, 1934.]PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

The defendant in each of these two cases was indicted, tried, convicted, and sentenced in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County for keeping and maintaining a bawdy house.

The indictment filed in each case contained two counts, the first for maintaining a bawdy house, the second for maintaining a disorderly house, and the two counts of the indictment in the one case are, except for the names, and that the first count in the case against Siegert does not conclude against the statute, identical in form and substance.

A demurrer to the indictment in Siegert’s case was overruled, as was a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harrison v. State ex rel. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  2. Heiskell v. Mayor & City CouncilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  3. Hooper v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  4. Greenwood v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  5. Beard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Philip Morris Inc. v. AngelettiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Witte v. AzarianCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API