Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. Ridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Union Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

This was a complaint in the usual form, by the appellee against the appellant, for killing the plaintiff’s stock, (hogs,) by the locomotive and cars of the company upon its road, where it was not fenced.

The action was brought before a justice of the peace, where the defendant filed an answer of two paragraphs, viz.:. 1. General denial; and,

2. Special matter.

A demurrer for want of sufficient facts, which was, doubtless, intended to be addressed to the second paragraph, but was in form addressed to the whole answer, was sustained by the justice, and such proceedings were had before him as that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. AdkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  2. President of the Terre Haute & Richmond Railroad v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Indianapolis, Pittsburgh & Cleveland Railroad v. ShimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. New Albany & Salem Railroad v. MaidenIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Bernhamer v. ConardIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago Railroad v. KreigerIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. FennIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Roberts v. NorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API