Application of David J. Pye and Donald K. Peterson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 11 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Soap Composition.” One claim was allowed by the board.
The appealed claim reads as follows:
11. A lubricious composition for the skin which consists essentially of a major proportion of ingredients selected from the group consisting of non-soap anionic and non-ionic synthetic organic detergents in intimate -mixture with from about 0.1 to 4 percent by weight, based on the weight of the total composition, of an acrylamide polymer, said polymer being…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Application of Stanley G. HalleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
- In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Application of Ulf C. H. JacobsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
- In re BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.