Legal Opinion

Application of David J. Pye and Donald K. Peterson

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 10, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7513PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 11 in appellants’ application 1 entitled “Soap Composition.” One claim was allowed by the board.

The appealed claim reads as follows:

11. A lubricious composition for the skin which consists essentially of a major proportion of ingredients selected from the group consisting of non-soap anionic and non-ionic synthetic organic detergents in intimate -mixture with from about 0.1 to 4 percent by weight, based on the weight of the total composition, of an acrylamide polymer, said polymer being…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Application of Philip A. Shaffer, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  2. Application of Stanley G. HalleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re SichertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. In re WatsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  3. In Re Diane M. DillonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Application of Ulf C. H. JacobsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  5. In re BoeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API