In re Boe
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103 of claims 1-9-^-all the claims in application serial No. 112,766, filed February 4, 1971, for “Release Finish for Yarns Containing Segmented Elastomers.” We affirm.
INVENTION
The invention involves a process for reducing tackiness of freshly spun filaments, composed at least partly of a segmented elastomeric polymer,1 by applying an aqueous, lubricating finish emulsion to such filaments, and the resulting lubricated filament. It is known that filaments…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In re KuehlCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In re WadlingerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Application of Floyd E. NaylorCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- Application of Jerome J. KanterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Wilhelm Neugebauer, Martha Tomanek and Hans BehmenburgCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joseph Solomon v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Ralston Purina Co. v. Far-Mar-Co, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1984
- In Re Donald R. Laskowski and Daniel R. TekulveCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989