Legal Opinion

Meginnes v. McChesney

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 24, 1916PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Johnson District Court. — R. P. Howell, Judge. Cora E. Meginnes filed a claim for amount alleged due on a note given to her by decedent shortly before his death. Trial resulted in a judgment as prajmd. The executrix and the administrator with the will annexed appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

l. evidence: preHonsi-uiraua1-il" consxdcraI. D. L. Houser died in Los Angeles, California, July 17, 1913, when neiu'ty years of age, leaving him surviviug a gon an¿ two daughters. On June 24th prior to his death, he gave claimant a prom*567issory note for $5,000, payable six months after date, with interest at the rate of 6 per cent per annum. Claim for the amount due thereon was filed October 1st of the same year, and trial thereof had in November, 1914. The defenses interposed were that the note was obtained by undue influence exerted by the payee, and was without consideration. Decedent…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Harris v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
  3. Cook v. BradleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  4. Linz v. SchuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1907
  5. Zimmerman v. BitnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1894

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gilman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Recker v. GustafsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Goodale v. MurraySupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. Woodward v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Brown v. HebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API