Langdon v. Richardson
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Kossuth Circuit Court. Action upon an account for goods and merchandise sold and delivered to one Fountain, for which the defendant agreed to pay. There was- a verdict and a judgment for plaintiff; defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
■Beck, J.
1. STATUTE OF FRAUDS: oral argument within the statute. I. The petition alleges that the goods were sold and delivered to Fountain under a contract with defendant, that he would pay for them. The petition also alleges that the goods were purchased for use in a hotel, and Eichardson was interested in the ' management thereof, and that the goods were sold by plaintiff, relying nj>on Eichardson’s responsibility.
In support of his petition, plaintiff’s son, who had charge of his store, testified as- follows: “Mr. Eichardson came in the store with Mr. Fountain, and told me to let Mr.…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Harris v. FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wood v. DodgeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- Cadd v. SnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
- Peyson v. ShellabargerNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
- Kansas City Sewer Pipe Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.